|
|
Posted by *alan* on 07/13/07 16:56
"Morton Davis" <antikerry@go.com> wrote in message
news:fKJli.27148$Fc.16575@attbi_s21...
>
> "vince" <vince@gmt.net> wrote in message
> news:Xns996C1950B6DD4ZXMA9@194.177.96.26...
>> http://www.mxpie.info/
>>
>> WINMX IS NOT CLOSING!!!!!
>>
>> July 6, 2007
>>
>> MXPie.info Team has released a special version of the MXPie Patch for
>> WinMX due to the recent closure of WinMXGroup.com.
>>
>> MXPie Special Release Version 3.5 includes:
>>
>> 1. Support for WCS 1.7.4 users to connect to WPN using MXPie Caches.
>>
>> 2. Support for WinMX Group DLL users to connect using MXPie Caches.
>>
>> MXPie Patch Version 3.5 is a special release for users who require a
>> connection method for WCS and the WinMX Group DLL due to the closure of
>> WinmxGroup.com (KM). This will allow connection through MXPie servers
>> which are independent from WinMXGroup.
>>
>>
>> The 3.54 patch below is working perfectly for me.
>>
>>
>> http://www.espwinmx.com/
>>
>> http://www.fisioterapiautebo.com/estwinmx/3.0mod2-3.54-Setup.exe
>>
>> http://www.fisioterapiautebo.com/estwinmx/3.0mod3-Multi-Setup.exe
>>
>> http://www.fisioterapiautebo.com/estwinmx/3.0mod3-Patch-Only-Setup.exe
>>
>> http://www.fisioterapiautebo.com/estwinmx/ws2_32.dll
>>
>> http://www.espwinmx.com/download/MXPie_Patch_v3.4.exe
>>
>> I'm back up and running.
>>
>
> Many of us never went down.
I find that rather odd, don't you?
I'd been running 3.54 and was unable to get a connection until I downloaded
the "updated" version from winmxworld (a suggestion that you had made on
July 10th, actually) and, if I recall correctly, there were a few posts here
(strangely enough, they appear to have been deleted) that recommended
changing the "hosts" file.
If (and it appears to be the case) WinMx was not connecting until it was
somehow altered, how is it that some existing installations needed neither
updating or alteration yet remained unaffected?
I'm far from computer-savvy, but this doesn't make sense to me. I'd be
grateful if anyone could offer an explanation.
Thanks.
--
Alan
[Back to original message]
|