Posted by Derek Janssen on 08/02/07 09:28

Archimedes' Lever wrote:
> On Wed, 01 Aug 2007 16:43:39 GMT, "Thomas G. Marshall"
> <tgm2tothe10thpower@replacetextwithnumber.hotmail.com> wrote:

>>
>>Yes, he spoke of something that was covered. But your response is far worse
>>and far more dammaging to the ng.
>
>
> Your unsolicited assessment is worse still.
>
>>If you want people to start taking you seriously,
>
>
> I could give a shit about your assessments.
>
>>and I'm guessing to stop
>>killfiling you, you should consider stopping the unsolicited ad hominem.
>>
>
> ALL ad hominem is always unsolicited, idiot.

(Oh, that's the other thing:

One of the reasons his posting is so prolific is that he tends to have
the "Paragraph context" comprehension of a chihuahua on espresso--
And not only will he believe that the last words to appear in a sentence
are what the discussion is now 110% about, he will also attack it with
the exact same adrenaline rush, as if he believed everyone else was now
talking about it.

For example, if you were to say that understanding HDMI was "as easy as
falling off a log", you could expect in five minutes his post of "What
do you know about logs?--Only a total uncoordinated retard falls off of
them! Do you know how long I've been practicing at staying on top of
logs? I was logrollling in the Lumberjack games when you were still
watching RCA!", etc...

Derek Janssen (Comprehension vs. Impulse to talk--There *is* a reason
why they ask those questions on the Verbal SAT)
ejanss@comcast.net

[Back to original message]