Posted by Bill on 08/09/07 20:00

Your character is quite clear in the nature of your reply. Enjoy your
own personal history of the world, nappy. Out of consideration for the
newsgroup, I'll drop the thread, but feel free to continue enlightening
us if you want to.

nappy wrote:
> "Bill" <trash@chromehorse.net> wrote in message
> news:yMGdnejlE5rcjSbbnZ2dnUVZ_qqgnZ2d@golden.net...
>
>>>Oh yeah-- I forgot how well that war in Iraq is going...
>
>
> Yes.. just how well is it going? Do you even know?
>
>
>
>>Maybe the Bush Administration should have asked citizens to create short
>>videos telling America why we invaded Iraq when the 9/11 hijackers came
>>from Saudi Arabia and trained in Afghanistan...
>
>
>
> There are plenty of Americans, including the ENTIRE CONGRESS save 1 or 2,
> who understood why Iraq had to be taken down. Just because you are too
> stupid to understand it doesn't mean shit.
>
> > Or do you still believe
>
>>they will find those weapons of mass destruction, Richard?
>
>
> Bad news for the weak minded.. WMD was never the issue. Although the entire
> Democratic Congress spoke ad nauseum about how Saddam had to go and did have
> WMD. Before Bush was even elected, ya dumbshit. Did you miss that??????
> We're in IRAQ to take care of IRAN. You see.. that stupid president who beat
> you idiots twice can actually think a lot further ahead than you can. The
> actual reason for being in Iraq will be clear in the coming months and
> years. And you will be kissing feet and eating crow until you are sick.
>
>
> Go ahead--
>
>>I'll let you take the last potshot. "Brainwashing" indeed.
>
>
> Yeah.. I know you _think_ you have an argument but here you are in a little
> video newsgroup wasting your time in a Heinz Ketchup thread with people
> making fun of you.
>
>
>
> here ya go STUPID.
>
>
> "One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to
> develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That
> is our bottom line." --President Bill Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998
>
> "If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We
> want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass
> destruction program." --President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998
>
> "Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal
> here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear,
> chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest
> security threat we face." --Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998
>
> "He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times
> since 1983." --Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18,
> 1998
>
> "[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S.
> Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate,
> air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to
> the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction
> programs." Letter to President Clinton, signed by: -- Democratic Senators
> Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others, Oct. 9, 1998
>
> "Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass
> destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he
> has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process." -Rep. Nancy Pelosi
> (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998
>
> "Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass
> destruction and palaces for his cronies." -- Madeline Albright, Clinton
> Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999
>
> "There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons
> programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs
> continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam
> continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a
> licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten
> the United States and our allies." Letter to President Bush, Signed by: --
> Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), and others, Dec 5, 2001
>
> "We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a
> threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate
> of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and th! e
> means of delivering them." -- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002
>
> "We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical
> weapons throughout his country." -- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002
>
> "Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to
> deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in
> power." -- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002
>
> "We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing
> weapons of mass destruction." -- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002
>
> "The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are
> confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and
> biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to
> build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence
> reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..." -- Sen. Robert Byrd
> (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002
>
> "I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority
> to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe
> that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real
> and grave threat to our security." -- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9,
> 2002
>
> "There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively
> to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the
> next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated
> the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass
> destruction." -- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002
>
> "He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every
> significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his
> chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has
> refused to do" -- Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002
>
> "In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that
> Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons
> stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also
> given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members
> ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will
> continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare,
> and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons." -- Sen. Hillary Clinton
> (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002
>
> "We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam
> Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for
> the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction." -- Sen. Bob
> Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002
>
> "Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal,
> murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a
> particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to
> miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his
> continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction
> ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is
> real..." -- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003
>
>

[Back to original message]