Posted by nappy on 08/09/07 20:03

"Bill" <trash@chromehorse.net> wrote in message
news:h_GdnaSnfNLI7ybbnZ2dnUVZ_vrinZ2d@golden.net...
> Your character is quite clear in the nature of your reply. Enjoy your own
> personal history of the world, nappy. Out of consideration for the
> newsgroup, I'll drop the thread, but feel free to continue enlightening us
> if you want to.


yes.. I thought that list of Dem quotes might shut you up..

It always comes in so fucking handy! I just keep it on my desktop for handy
access when dealing with the brainwashed minions.





>
> nappy wrote:
>> "Bill" <trash@chromehorse.net> wrote in message
>> news:yMGdnejlE5rcjSbbnZ2dnUVZ_qqgnZ2d@golden.net...
>>
>>>>Oh yeah-- I forgot how well that war in Iraq is going...
>>
>>
>> Yes.. just how well is it going? Do you even know?
>>
>>
>>
>>>Maybe the Bush Administration should have asked citizens to create short
>>>videos telling America why we invaded Iraq when the 9/11 hijackers came
>>>from Saudi Arabia and trained in Afghanistan...
>>
>>
>>
>> There are plenty of Americans, including the ENTIRE CONGRESS save 1 or 2,
>> who understood why Iraq had to be taken down. Just because you are too
>> stupid to understand it doesn't mean shit.
>>
>> > Or do you still believe
>>
>>>they will find those weapons of mass destruction, Richard?
>>
>>
>> Bad news for the weak minded.. WMD was never the issue. Although the
>> entire Democratic Congress spoke ad nauseum about how Saddam had to go
>> and did have WMD. Before Bush was even elected, ya dumbshit. Did you miss
>> that?????? We're in IRAQ to take care of IRAN. You see.. that stupid
>> president who beat you idiots twice can actually think a lot further
>> ahead than you can. The actual reason for being in Iraq will be clear in
>> the coming months and years. And you will be kissing feet and eating crow
>> until you are sick.
>>
>>
>> Go ahead--
>>
>>>I'll let you take the last potshot. "Brainwashing" indeed.
>>
>>
>> Yeah.. I know you _think_ you have an argument but here you are in a
>> little video newsgroup wasting your time in a Heinz Ketchup thread with
>> people making fun of you.
>>
>>
>>
>> here ya go STUPID.
>>
>>
>> "One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to
>> develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them.
>> That is our bottom line." --President Bill Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998
>>
>> "If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear.
>> We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass
>> destruction program." --President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998
>>
>> "Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great
>> deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use
>> nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the
>> greatest security threat we face." --Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998
>>
>> "He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times
>> since 1983." --Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18,
>> 1998
>>
>> "[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the
>> U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if
>> appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond
>> effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of
>> mass destruction programs." Letter to President Clinton, signed by: --
>> Democratic Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others, Oct.
>> 9, 1998
>>
>> "Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass
>> destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and
>> he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process." -Rep. Nancy
>> Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998
>>
>> "Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass
>> destruction and palaces for his cronies." -- Madeline Albright, Clinton
>> Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999
>>
>> "There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons
>> programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs
>> continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition,
>> Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the
>> cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that
>> will threaten the United States and our allies." Letter to President
>> Bush, Signed by: -- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), and others, Dec 5, 2001
>>
>> "We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a
>> threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the
>> mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction
>> and th! e means of delivering them." -- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept.
>> 19, 2002
>>
>> "We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical
>> weapons throughout his country." -- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002
>>
>> "Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to
>> deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is
>> in power." -- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002
>>
>> "We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and
>> developing weapons of mass destruction." -- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA),
>> Sept. 27, 2002
>>
>> "The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are
>> confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and
>> biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to
>> build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence
>> reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..." -- Sen. Robert
>> Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002
>>
>> "I will be voting to give the President of the United States the
>> authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein
>> because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in
>> his hands is a real and grave threat to our security." -- Sen. John F.
>> Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002
>>
>> "There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working
>> aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear
>> weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have
>> always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of
>> weapons of mass destruction." -- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10,
>> 2002
>>
>> "He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years,
>> every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and
>> destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity.
>> This he has refused to do" -- Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002
>>
>> "In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show
>> that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological
>> weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program.
>> He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al
>> Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam
>> Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and
>> chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons." --
>> Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002
>>
>> "We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that
>> Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing
>> capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass
>> destruction." -- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002
>>
>> "Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal,
>> murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a
>> particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to
>> miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his
>> continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction
>> ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is
>> real..." -- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003
>>

[Back to original message]