|
|
Posted by def456 on 08/25/07 21:43
"Linea Recta" <mccm.vos@abc.invalid> wrote in message
news:46d0646b$0$241$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl...
> <DaveJohnson12@nomail.> schreef in bericht
> news:u5lvc3tlohv824s7sff0008g8r0mbdo4rr@4ax.com...
>> On Tue, 21 Aug 2007 12:58:33 +0200, "Linea Recta" <mccm.vos@abc.invalid>
> wrote:
>>
>> ><DaveJohnson12@nomail.> schreef in bericht
>> >news:knj4c39rciddk2ogkuonr6q49ekqbe9ei5@4ax.com...
>> >> On Tue, 14 Aug 2007 11:17:19 GMT, nick <nick@NOSPAM.ORG> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >BigJim wrote:
>> >> >> I like NEC but what ever you order make sure you get what your
> system
>> >uses,
>> >> >> either sata or IDE.
>> >> >
>> >> >Over the past few years I have had trouble reading some discs with
>> >> >NEC
>> >> >drives and have gradually replaced them all with Lite-On, which seem
>> >> >to read anything.
>> >> >
>> >> >nick
>> >>
>> >> Thanks, I'll probably go with Light On I guess or maybe an LG though I
>> >haven't
>> >> had much success with Korean (LG) products. They tend to be not as
>> >> good
> as
>> >> products from Japanese companies from what I've seen.
>> >
>> >
>> >I have an LG multiburber in the PC and I have an LG standalone HDD/DVD
>> >recorder. Both of them work fine here.
>>
>> Thanks. I decided on an LG. The reviews from people who bought DVD
>> burners
> were
>> a little better than the reviews for Lite On.
>
>
> I wish you all the best with the new device. I think as a whole LG is
> great
> value for the money.
> BTW, I have done some firmware updates already (on both).
I have both a Lite-On and LG installed as master/slave, and haven't had any
problems ripping/burning with either... The Lite-On is faster for
ripping/verifying. LG has a better reputation for burning, but it's slower
for ripping/verifying out of the box. You can make it faster for
ripping/verifying if you want to risk a speed increase MCSE patch at
http://club.cdfreaks.com/showthread.php?t=133858
I did it for mine and it's now about as fast as the Lite-On. I must flip a
coin to decide which one to use!?
[Back to original message]
|