Posted by Smarty on 10/03/07 14:15

Higher resolution is the most noticeable improvement. I also happen to
prefer the Canon color, and find it more neutral and pleasing to look at.
The low light also seems less noisy than the FX-1. Take a look at the HV20
forum at:

http://www.dvinfo.net/conf/forumdisplay.php?f=139


for a lot of HV20 info.

Smarty


"Luru Dai" <kikidai@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1191398001.548500.249280@19g2000hsx.googlegroups.com...
> On Oct 2, 9:37 pm, "Smarty" <nob...@nobody.com> wrote:
>> The HV20 is cheaply built but takes excellent video, way better than the
>> 3
>> CCD HDV Sony camcorder (FX-1) and the HC3 I previously owned. The audio
>> quality is good but not excellent. I would strongly recommend the HV20
>> after
>> owning and using several HDV camcorders. It is a great bargain now for
>> well
>> below $1000 in the U.S.
>>
>> Smarty
>>
>
> Thank you for your answer. HV20 is even better than FX-1, I did know
> it. Could you tell me HV20 gives better video in which sense? Higher
> resolution, better colour rendition, or better low light performance.
>

[Back to original message]