Posted by nappy on 10/16/07 17:24

"Rick Merrill" <rick0.merrill@NOSPAM.gmail.com> wrote in message
news:RvudnSr6cb6le47anZ2dnUVZ_oesnZ2d@comcast.com...
> nappy wrote:
>> "Rick Merrill" <rick0.merrill@NOSPAM.gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>> The FS 'chains' segments together with references to the multiple file
>>>> segments so they look like single files to the importing app.
>>> Is the following what you mean by "chains"?
>>> "s_SAVBLD-092211-00"
>>> "s_SAVBLD-092211-01"
>>> "s_SAVBLD-092211-02"
>>> "s_SAVBLD-092211-03"
>>> "s_SAVBLD-092211-04"
>>> "s_SAVBLD-092211-05"
>>>
>>>
>>
>> No those would be the independent file segments.
>>
>> I was referring to the method which the FS OS uses to provide the files
>> to , for instance, FCP's log and transfer.
>
> Yes, FCP recognizes "s_SAVBLD-092211" as a single <thingy>, but it would
> assume that "s_SAVBLD-092311" is another <thingy> until you tell it
> differently.

what?

>
>> Perhaps the concatenation is done in the plugin for the file type, which
>> for the FS100/HVX200, I believe is mxf.
>
> MXF files are complex wrappers for as many as 4 parallel files. Sadly not
> all vendors doing "mxf" agree on what is, like ragoo sauce, "in there."

what? Yes.. they are wrappers as I have been saying all along! They include
references to the video/audio data chunks on the drives. Vendors ? What?

>
> FCP has a plugin/tool for doing mxf, but finding out what equipment is
> compatible with said output is difficult!

mxf is an input format for the HVX. Not an output format.

we're not talking about the same things. This thread is dead. I'm weary


>
>
>

[Back to original message]