|
Posted by Kinon O'Cann on 11/02/07 17:07
"Patrick Vervoorn" <patrick.vervoorn@NOSPAM.perihelion.demon.nl> wrote in
message news:d739a$472b4530$82a1d3bf$18180@news2.tudelft.nl...
> In article <bRGWi.457$C8.18@bos-service2b.ext.ray.com>,
> Kinon O'Cann <somewhere@over.the.rainbow> wrote:
>>
>>"Patrick Vervoorn" <patrick.vervoorn@NOSPAM.perihelion.demon.nl> wrote in
>>message news:ef770$472b3431$82a1d3bf$14636@news2.tudelft.nl...
>
>>> So I'd like to find out what 22+" Widescreen monitors are around which
>>> use
>>> an IPS panel, and which also have a quick-response time (around 5ms or
>>> lower)...
>>
>>Here's a few links to get you started:
>>
>>http://www.hardforum.com/showthread.php?t=1039222
>>http://www.pchardwarehelp.com/guides/lcd-panel-types.php
>>http://www.widescreengamingforum.com/wiki/index.php?title=Master_Monitors_List
>
> Thanks, I'll look into it.
>
>>The best advice is this: Eizo if you can afford them, NEC for a little
>>less,
>>and then "search and destroy." I'm using an HP 2065 with an IPS panel, and
>>it's very nice. I"d like bigger, but didn't want to spend a fortune. And
>>yes, the difference between an IPS panel monitor and TN is HUGE when it
>>comes to photo editing.
>
> Well, I'm not doing _any_ photo editting at all, so that would not be a
> deciding factor to go for an IPS vs another type of panel.
>
> I suppose the links above explain this, but I haven't looked into them, so
> forgive my following question: what other advantages does an IPS panel
> have over the other panel technologies?
Best to read the above technical articles, since you really need to match
the panel to the use. If you're not editing, but gaming, then a panel with a
better response time would work better.
>
> Regards, Patrick.
[Back to original message]
|