Reply to Re: Why interlace?

Your name:

Reply:


Posted by Johan Stck on 11/09/07 12:13

Spex skrev:
>

>>
> The HV20 uses a CMOS chip and can therefore either be read interlaced or
> progressive. It is one of the huge benefits of using CMOS that
> individual pixels can be addressed.
>
> My XH-A1 uses interlaced CCDs but is able to construct a progressive
> frame by clocking one of the ccds (green) a field out of sync with the
> others. There is a slight resolution drop when using the faux
> progressive "F" mode. I understand there is no resolution drop between
> progressive and interlaced mode on the HV20 which is expected.

As I understand it, Canon promotes the HV20 as a 1080i camcorder.
They do not promote is a switchable 1080i/720p. (but, perhaps it still is?)

So, what is the difference (if any) between "true" 720p and the
progressive feature of the HV20?

/JS

[Back to original message]


Удаленная работа для программистов  •  Как заработать на Google AdSense  •  статьи на английском  •  England, UK  •  PHP MySQL CMS Apache Oscommerce  •  Online Business Knowledge Base  •  IT news, forums, messages
Home  •  Search  •  Site Map  •  Set as Homepage  •  Add to Favourites
Разработано в студии "Webous"