Posted by Rita � Berkowitz on 11/10/07 21:51

Al Paca wrote:

> It looks like you showed him.

No, I'm not really trying to show Bob anything that he should already know
if he had real world hands on experience. This is more for the benefit of
the people that would read and believe his bullshit. He has demonstrated
with his waffling and creative thread snipping that he is a classic example
of a typical arrogant newsgroup asshole trying to save face when presented
with actual evidence that proves them wrong. Had Bob actually had real
world experience and physically touched what he is writing about he would
have a clue and be able to provide his readers with accurate and factual
information. One thing I have learned on Usenet is if you advertise your
business or have to brag or spam your credentials and perceived
"accomplishments" in the newsgroups you know you are a total and complete
failure.

It's amazing how Bob's claim went from this filter "doesn't exist" to "The
slight tint to the thin film layer is incidental to its function, and has no
significant impact on the color characteristics of the completed module"
when presented with the evidence. We call this "waffling" in these parts.

And another inaccuracy Bob mentions is "the clear film and the top
"silver/pearl" layer are there for brightness enhancement." There was no
"clear film" on top or in the backlight assembly; there was a blue/green
filter. If the backlight panel didn't need color correction there would be
an optically clear and color neutral layer or no layer at all. Introducing
color in the light path indicates a need for color correction, there's no
disputing this fact.

Since I'm not an expert on this subject nor am I qualified to be one I'll
let Bob continue to waffle his way through this so he can make another lame
attempt to save face. You guys have fun with it.





Rita


> Rita Ä Berkowitz wrote:
>> Bob Myers wrote:
>>
>>>> You're being trolled. Rita is nothing more than an illiterate troll
>>>> who seeks to engage unsuspecting NG posters with an endless series
>>>> of useless dialogs. It's clear that your knowledge of LCD panels
>>>> far, far surpasses hers, but she continues to drag you down into
>>>> the mud.
>>>
>>> Perhaps; but on the other hand, there's at least a chance
>>> SOMEONE will gain some useful information from all
>>> of this.
>>
>> OK, Bob. I guess a picture is worth a thousand words in this case? I had
>> one of the boys split open an LG panel today and here is what
>> we found inside. I'll let you name the components since your
>> expertise far exceeds mine, being that you wrote a book on the
>> subject. I numbered the components
>> and the one I'm really concerned about is #5. You know, that one
>> with a very slight blue/green tint to it. LG put a colored piece of
>> plastic in there to correct something. Hell, looks like they put a
>> lot of plastic layers in the backlight assembly to do something. You name
>> em and tell the rubes out here what they do as we won't
>> know the difference anyway.
>> <http://www.geocities.com/ritaberk2007/backlight.htm>
>>
>> Bob, I'm not trying to bust your balls, but do you remember the four
>> basic food groups? How about how many planets we now have in the
>> solar system? Things change. I understand now that you have a
>> vested interest in showing everyone you are right since you "wrote"
>> a book. I have no vested interest other than stating my findings
>> and playing with idiots that like getting into pissing contests. It's
>> possible you and/or your book need a little revising. My
>> suggestion is take it up with LG. There is nowhere else we can go
>> with this discussion; I'm done with you. Rita

[Back to original message]