Reply to Re: WMA gets taken Down By The River

Your name:

Reply:


Posted by Jack on 12/01/07 07:25

Steven Sullivan <ssully@panix.com> wrote in
news:fiphic$rn7$1@reader1.panix.com:

> 128WMA CBR via FairStars Audio Converter (shows as 129 kbps)
> http://www.badongo.com/file/5364159

Now it gets interesting: GoldWave shows that yours was encoded with WMA
9.1, whereas mine (below) is WMA 9.2.

http://www.badongo.com/file/5372700 (3:30 to 4:00 WMA)

There is a chance they muddled something between those versions. Something
that just doesn't like old Neil Young analog masters?

Jack

[Back to original message]


Удаленная работа для программистов  •  Как заработать на Google AdSense  •  статьи на английском  •  England, UK  •  PHP MySQL CMS Apache Oscommerce  •  Online Business Knowledge Base  •  IT news, forums, messages
Home  •  Search  •  Site Map  •  Set as Homepage  •  Add to Favourites
Разработано в студии "Webous"