Reply to Re: WMA gets taken Down By The River

Your name:

Reply:


Posted by Arny Krueger on 12/02/07 13:18

"NRen2k5" <nomore@email.com> wrote in message
news:g4y4j.4$QL4.766@wagner.videotron.net
> Arny Krueger wrote:
>> "Jack" <jack@beanstalk.net> wrote in message
>> news:Xns99F8DEE5D5EE6jack@216.168.3.44

>>> I just closed my eyes and heard the difference even
>>> better. The MP3 is significantly cleaner than the WMA,
>>> which isn't usually the case with those formats at 128
>>> kbps.
>>
>> Stop stonewalling, Jack.
>
> Wow, the lengths to which some people will go to avoid
> such simple tests when the thing you want to test is
> something they're sooo certain of....

After 30 years its in the running for being one of the older stories in
modern hi fi.

Interestingly enough, there might be an audible problem - if he'd only
bother to just listen.

The confidence he expresses is obviously false bravado. Because, if he was
really sure of himself, he'd do his homework. At this point, it is all about
fear of the dark for him.

[Back to original message]


Удаленная работа для программистов  •  Как заработать на Google AdSense  •  статьи на английском  •  England, UK  •  PHP MySQL CMS Apache Oscommerce  •  Online Business Knowledge Base  •  IT news, forums, messages
Home  •  Search  •  Site Map  •  Set as Homepage  •  Add to Favourites
Разработано в студии "Webous"