Posted by nappy on 12/02/07 22:22

"Jacques E. Bouchard" <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
news:Xns99FA8190D16E8jebouchard451yahooca@204.153.245.131...

> I'm sorry, maybe there was something about my post that wasn't perfectly
> clear. Here it is again. I typed more slowly this time to let you catch
> up:

nice. You may not know this but typing slowly doesn't really have any effect
on the speed at which the words show up in a post.

>
> The mic doesn't pick up any of the room's echo that a camera-mounted mic
> would (regardless of quality).

Probably because it rolls off at 1000Hz?

>> Neither does it pick up interference. I've
> used it several times, and it's perfectly suitable for interviews.

Probably because it rools off at 1000Hz?

> The
> only drawback is the flimsy construction, but as I said I recommend it
> for anyone who wants to know whether a wireless lav mic is adequate for
> their needs, before committing several hundred dollars to a quality mic.

Hollywood will be so happy to hear about your discovery!

If you want crap. Pay for crap. You'll get crap. It will always be crap.


>
>
> jaybee

[Back to original message]