Posted by Arny Krueger on 12/04/07 13:26

"Jack" <jack@beanstalk.net> wrote in message
news:Xns99FBD07CB738jack@216.168.3.44
> "Arny Krueger" <arnyk@hotpop.com> wrote in
> news:-JydnbO3nLqp3czanZ2dnUVZ_oesnZ2d@comcast.com:
>
>>>> BTW, blind tests comparing .wav files to coded files
>>>> are slam-dunk easy. Please see www.pcabx.com and the
>>>> Hydrogen Audio forums for more information.
>>>
>>> It looks like you're trying to market something that's
>>> not pertinent to this example.
>>
>> How not pertinent?
>
> Because the artifacts are so obvious that blind tests
> aren't needed. You shot out of the starting gate with the
> nutty assumption that I refuse to do blind listening
> tests.

You've been pretty adamant about not doing them, and repeatly abused my
suggestions that you try them.

> You won't even listen to (or at least comment on)
> my samples, so what difference does it make?

Actually, I did both, which is more than you've done for me.

I'm done with you, Jack and leave you to wallow in your own bad faith and
out-of-control emotions.

> Here they are one last time, if you're tired of pretending that "broken"
> links are stopping you from being reasonable.

http://www.badongo.com/file/5372691 (Down By The River 3:30-4:00 WAV)
http://www.badongo.com/file/5372700 (Down By The River 3:30-4:00 WMA)
http://www.badongo.com/file/5372709 (Down By The River 3:30-4:00 MP3)

Can't read, can you Jack? I mentioned that I downloaded them what 2 days
ago?

[Back to original message]