Posted by ChairmanOfTheBored on 12/20/07 00:01

On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 05:30:11 -0800 (PST), ninphan <sjburke73@hotmail.com>
wrote:

>On Dec 18, 1:28 am, ChairmanOfTheBored <RUBo...@crackasmile.org>
>wrote:
>> On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 06:08:11 -0800 (PST), ninphan <sjburk...@hotmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >On Dec 14, 9:06 pm, ChairmanOfTheBored <RUBo...@crackasmile.org>
>> >wrote:
>> >> On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 07:18:12 -0800 (PST), ninphan <sjburk...@hotmail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>>
>> >> >2) HD DVD manufacturing costs are not "well below" Blu-ray disc
>> >> >manufacturing costs nor will they increase in disparity
>>
>> >> BULLSHIT!
>>
>> >> HD DVD was and is made on the SAME disc fab machinery as std DVD, and it
>> >> was BluRay that had all new gear to do their startup.
>>
>> >> SO YES, it did, and DOES cost considerably less per disc than a BR
>> >> disc.
>>
>> >> Also, the BR hard coat is an EXTRA step.
>>
>> >> Can you say DO THE MATH, you retarded fuck?
>>
>> >Hey dumbass - I've already proved it using sources like the President
>> >and Executive Producer of R&B Films.
>> >What sources do you have? Nothing? Yeah I didn't think so...you're an
>> >uneducated fool - give it up while you can.
>>
>> You're the idiot. It is a known fact that HD DVD is made on the same
>> disc Mfg process as DVD, and it is also a known fact that BR required new
>> machinery. Amortize that, dipshit, if you even know what the word means.
>>
>> THEN, the new hardcoat comes in, and it most certainly IS an extra
>> step, and most certainly DOES have an extra cost attached to it, and some
>> lame fuck that only gets a couple hundred k discs pressed cannot give you
>> figures that compare with what a 10 million piece run has.
>>
>> >If the president and executive producer is telling me that the
>> >difference between releasing Nature's Journey on both HD DVD and Blu-
>> >ray was "negligible" and you're telling me as some goof online who
>> >swears a lot that HD DVD is "considerably less" who do you think I or
>> >anyone else is going to believe.
>>
>> I don't care what you believe.
>>
>> >(PS - you do realise that the same people who run most of the discs
>> >for these studios, SonyDADC, Technicolor, Panasonic, Cinram, Deluxe,
>> >etc., already have their lines upgraded and that the small studios
>> >don't incur the costs of upgrading their lines. No, apparently you do
>> >not!)
>>
>> It is old news that there were no "line upgrades" required for HD DVD ,
>> and there WERE for Blu Ray.
>>
>> It has to do with where the layer resides.
>>
>> You ain't real bright, boy.- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
>That's right because the more you order the less per disc it costs.
>Not so bright are you? Major in business? I didn't think so.
>As for HD DVD the lines did need to be modified, not upgraded, but
>again that is a cost that the replicator has to endure, it is not
>passed on to the studio. You are obviously not too familiar with the
>whole process while I have been inside several sites from PDMC in CA
>to Cinram in Canada.
>As for not being too bright, you're the idiot that claimed that the
>new KURO line from Pioneer was only capable of 60Hz and thus
>susceptible of judder, then you admit you didn't even look it up. So
>we can conclude from this thread that you just spew forth a load of
>crap on your keyboard for everyone to read without even knowing what
>you're talking about.
>At least we know now to take everything you say with a grain of salt
>the size of Gibraltar.
>Please drive through.


Nice job of proving to everyone that you are nothing more than a Sony
shill.

I am quite sure those plants have public walk throughs every day,
fuckhead.

[Back to original message]