Reply to Re: Latest on archival quality DVD?

Your name:

Reply:


Posted by geoff on 12/31/07 01:45

Richard Crowley wrote:
> "geoff" wrote ...
>> If you want specifics, some of the media they list as 4th grade junk,
>> I have been using extremely successfully for years as my primary
>> duplication stock.
>>
>> They list SKC with a less than 50% success rate. I have never had a
>> failed burn due to media, and have had no complaints from customers,
>> CD or DVD, as to deterioration over time.
>>
>> They als seem to think that some 'brand names' actually manufacture
>> media for the actual manufacturers !
>>
>> I called that fucked up. Maybe they have a stuffed burner ?
>
> OK, then provide the URL of your website whiere you publish
> your findings. Else my opinion of which of you is legitimate
> vs. a random usenet poster remains unchained. Nice try.

WTF would I want 'publish my findings' on a website. I simply make a
real-life observation from my experience in over 7 years of commercial CD
and DVD duplication.

geoff

[Back to original message]


Удаленная работа для программистов  •  Как заработать на Google AdSense  •  статьи на английском  •  England, UK  •  PHP MySQL CMS Apache Oscommerce  •  Online Business Knowledge Base  •  IT news, forums, messages
Home  •  Search  •  Site Map  •  Set as Homepage  •  Add to Favourites
Разработано в студии "Webous"