Posted by Richard Crowley on 12/31/07 02:06

"geoff" wrote ...
> Richard Crowley wrote:
>> "geoff" wrote ...
>>> If you want specifics, some of the media they list as 4th grade
>>> junk,
>>> I have been using extremely successfully for years as my primary
>>> duplication stock.
>>>
>>> They list SKC with a less than 50% success rate. I have never had a
>>> failed burn due to media, and have had no complaints from customers,
>>> CD or DVD, as to deterioration over time.
>>>
>>> They als seem to think that some 'brand names' actually manufacture
>>> media for the actual manufacturers !
>>>
>>> I called that fucked up. Maybe they have a stuffed burner ?
>>
>> OK, then provide the URL of your website whiere you publish
>> your findings. Else my opinion of which of you is legitimate
>> vs. a random usenet poster remains unchained. Nice try.
>
> WTF would I want 'publish my findings' on a website.

To establish your credentials. Else you are indistinguishable
from somebody who got lucky with a spindle of cheap discs
from the corner drugstore.

> I simply make a real-life observation from my experience in over 7
> years of commercial CD and DVD duplication.

OK. Without that statement, we had no way of knowing
what your background, credibility, experience, or sample-
size is.

It isn't a hard concept to grasp: The only thing we know
about you is what you write here. And Usenet (and the
internet in general) is full of poseurs and yahoos. The tone
of your original statement did nothing to imply any kind
of credibility.

[Back to original message]