Posted by ChairmanOfTheBored on 12/31/07 14:06

On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 14:45:29 +1300, "geoff" <geoff@nospam-paf.co.nz>
wrote:

>Richard Crowley wrote:
>> "geoff" wrote ...
>>> If you want specifics, some of the media they list as 4th grade junk,
>>> I have been using extremely successfully for years as my primary
>>> duplication stock.
>>>
>>> They list SKC with a less than 50% success rate. I have never had a
>>> failed burn due to media, and have had no complaints from customers,
>>> CD or DVD, as to deterioration over time.
>>>
>>> They als seem to think that some 'brand names' actually manufacture
>>> media for the actual manufacturers !
>>>
>>> I called that fucked up. Maybe they have a stuffed burner ?
>>
>> OK, then provide the URL of your website whiere you publish
>> your findings. Else my opinion of which of you is legitimate
>> vs. a random usenet poster remains unchained. Nice try.
>
>WTF would I want 'publish my findings' on a website. I simply make a
>real-life observation from my experience in over 7 years of commercial CD
>and DVD duplication.
>
>geoff
>


Like I said... PIRATE.

[Back to original message]