Posted by 夜クローラー on 01/24/08 02:23

> Many catalog titles score high in video quality in reviews because the
> reviewers are looking at how clean the transfer from the source is,
> the existence of artifacts, haloing, etc. In most cases, however, this
> only results in a clean print that still looks like a movie produced a
> long time ago. In these cases, 99% of consumers will just buy the DVD
> version if they haven't already.
>

This is something I'm wondering about and I suppose I won't know until I
see it for myself, but are movies from 30 years ago (for example,
Superman: The Movie) really gonna look any better than they did on dvd?


--
NiGHTS/Nightcrawler [mWo]
I feel asleep!

"If Gods so fuckin' perfect why'd he fuck up on you?"

[Back to original message]