|
|
Posted by Roy L. Fuchs on 09/26/71 11:39
On Wed, 8 Feb 2006 02:12:07 -0800, "Alpha" <none@none.net> Gave us:
>
>"Roy L. Fuchs" <roylfuchs@urfargingicehole.org> wrote in message
>news:le6ju1pr28fbeumlg32g8jjej450lgab9f@4ax.com...
>> On Tue, 7 Feb 2006 22:15:17 -0800, "Alpha" <none@none.net> Gave us:
>>
>>>
>>>"Roy L. Fuchs" <roylfuchs@urfargingicehole.org> wrote in message
>>>news:pfmiu1lh1eqv6fqug10thgqvrj8ikqebj9@4ax.com...
>>>> On Tue, 7 Feb 2006 16:47:17 -0800, "Alpha" <none@none.net> Gave us:
>>>>
>>>>>For very simple monochromatic labels, the Casio CD/DVD thermal printers
>>>>>work
>>>>>great and in about 3 seconds. The Lightscribe idea was always suspect.
>>>>>
>>>> HAhahaha... what a fucking joke you are!
>>>>
>>>> A thermal printer?
>>>>
>>>> Hahahaha... the worst type of printer as well as finished product in
>>>> use by the printer industry today!
>>>
>>>This is BY FAR the most fucking stupid remark you have ever made.
>>>
>> You are one clueless bastard. Tell us, of dipshit... What is the
>> highest resolution available today in thermal printing? I'll even
>> help out by giving you the name of a premier thermal printer maker so
>> you can go look it up: Zebra.
>>
>> Case closed... they ALL suck, big time. So do you.
>
>Resolution? Give me a break and tell me one commercial house that uses ink
>jets.
>
Photo labs, in fact, are moving to inkjets, and no longer make
enlargements using developed film anymore.
We have a photographer living in the house, and his last set of
enlargements were done that way just last week, and it IS becoming the
standard, and NOTHING your lame ass says about it will stop it, or
make it untrue.
I use a laser printer and Quark express to design and print all my
labels, and then laminate plastic film over the printed product. I
have used inkjets for the same task, now that they are high resolution
as well.
Thermal printers are NOT, and the output product is susceptible to
damage.
PDFs can be made at up to 3600 dpi resolution. Printing that means
that the printer's resolution is not hampered by the resolution of the
original, which is usually why a print job can look bad. The
resolution of the source data is always important.
The resolution of the printer is important as well.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|