|
|
Posted by Sandoz on 10/05/48 11:39
"Agent_C" <Agent-C-hates-spam@nyc.rr.com> wrote in message
news:m43lu19ek7rv26p901qngeargigkuf9mag@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 08 Feb 2006 20:30:43 GMT, "Sandoz" <blumphf@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>The lightscribe burner came with the new desktop system I bought, so i
>>bought some disks and tried it out...
>>
>>As far as I'm concerned, it entirely satisfied my primary purpose for
>>using
>>it--making a list of the tracks on the CD so I don't need to physically
>>write them out on the disk. I could care whether it took 23 minutes, 2
>>minutes, or 123 minutes to do this--I'm not part of the A.D.D.
>>generation--I
>>learned a long time ago the world will turn at it's own pace, not the one
>>I
>>expect it to.
>>
>>And c'mon, don't be so anal retentive--worry more about your fingerprints
>>on
>>the OTHER side of the disk where the actual content is, rather than a
>>little
>>smudge on the label side...
>>
>>Sandoz
>
> You're a pompous ass.
>
> A_C
Perhaps, but at least I'm happy with the results from my lightscribe burner,
for now anyway, at least until they invent one that can burn photo quality
graphics in full color directly onto the disk, not those adhesive
illustrated labels (which I don't trust enough to keep their contact on the
disk indefinitely, at least until some time has passed and the verdict comes
in whether they're dependable or not).
s
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|