|
|
Posted by wunnuy on 02/11/06 21:25
Sam Rouse wrote:
> In article <43edf93c.2491703@news-server.houston.rr.com>, spam@uce.gov (Bob)
>>
> NF wants to make a profit, which they didn't for the first several years of
> their existence, as they built customer base and infrastructure. 13 discs per
> month for $17.99 is still a good deal, even if you don't count the size of the
> library and curbside service. What I see here is a handful of folks who, for
> whatever reason, have the time and desire to get more DVDs than the majority of
> NF customers want. Most folks simply don't have the time to watch more than
> that, or the desire to build a giant library of ripped copies that they'll never
> watch more than once, anyway. So, my prediction is that throttling won't stop
> (or perhaps a limit will be imposed, but I hope not), advertising will change,
> Netflix will continue to be successful, and a small percentage of folks will
> continue to whine.
>
No one will "whine" if Netflix changes their advertising. If they say
"get as many as you want unless you get too many, we'll hold them back
a couple days" no one will whine because if that's what they do. I'm
sick of people who stick up for Netflix's false advertising by WHINING
that people who complain about it should just be happy with what they
get. That's not the point. The point is, Netflix claims one thing and
does the opposite. If they make "Throttling" part of their advertising,
then no one will "whine" (except for you I think).
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|