|
|
Posted by Hammerer on 09/05/05 20:04
"occasional user" <me@fallseaddress.com> wrote in message
news:Kj1Te.24747$ih4.19202@fe02.lga...
>
> "FatKat" <robynari@juno.com> wrote in message
> news:1125948087.834464.198530@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>
> > I don't think that WinMX will be cited because I don't think that
> > winMX is the source of anything - it's just a client program that
> > user rely on to connect with other users. Since it doesn't rely on
> > adware as other P2P software does - and lacks any other profit
> > motive and doesn't seem to have any ongoing input from its
> > developers - I doubt the program itself will face any liability.
> >
>
> FatKat, thanks, but my question was probably poorly worded
> or misunderstood.
>
Speaking as a casual observer, I'd have to agree wholeheartedly with you on
both points, there.
>
> The question is not if WinMX or FrontCode have been sued
> but have the users of WinMX been sued for downloading or
> making available for downloading as have some of the other
> P2P programs. ( clear as mud ? )
>
No way, occasional user / me (you, not me). It's as clear as a clear lake,
or something poetic like that. It's that FatKat. He's always 'doing in'
people like you (no offence) on the internet. Beware of him asking you about
your QED settings, or whatever.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|