|
|
Posted by anthonyberet on 09/06/05 21:24
Morton Davis wrote:
> "W????n" <???????@???????.gov> wrote in message
> news:6dCdnb9dYKd2FIHeRVn-gg@comcast.com...
>
>>"FeMaster" <FeMaster @ hotmail . com> wrote in message
>>news:ToISe.4148$3R1.3861@fe06.lga...
>>
>>><1@odds.com> wrote in message
>>>news:1j0lh1pkf8p2716fdc1pc5tmaog3u6a3hn@4ax.com...
>>>
>>>>Much speculation has been made about the origin and operations behind
>>>>the fake file problem. Here, Macrovision takes the credit....
>>>>
>>>>http://www.slyck.com/news.php?story=897
>>>
>>>I love this paragraph...
>>>
>>>"Macrovision claims that this fake file flood is so successful that very
>>>often their useless files are achieving more P2P client search engine
>
> hits
>
>>>than the files they are spoofing. This is due to P2P users failing to
>
> keep
>
>>>their shared music collections clear of corrupted or worthless files."
>>>
>>>And this is the BIGGEST problem we have today. People download and
>>>download, but then never go back and CHECK their files. I see legit
>>>accounts daily that have tons of decent content, but it is offset by the
>>>number of corrupt and useless files they also have...
>>>
>>>People need to start checking their files and DELETING the junk! How
>
> many
>
>>>of you that share files in the thousands range can actually say that
>
> they
>
>>>have check and verified EVERY file you share? Based on the number of
>>>shared
>>>files with junk characters, numbers (1), improper capitalization,
>>>misspellings, etc., I'd say VERY FEW can claim this...
>>>
>>>
>>
>>I can!
>>
>>
>
> Mee too. I only share completed files. If they're bad - I don't share them.
>
>
I do, I will share any old shit.
- Somebody might want it...
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|