|
|
Posted by Hammerer on 09/08/05 20:02
"anthonyberet" <nospam@me.invalid> wrote in message
news:3o93jpF4m328U2@individual.net...
>
> Hammerer wrote:
>
> > "anthonyberet" <nospam@me.invalid> wrote in message
> > news:3o6fnlF4h3bnU3@individual.net...
> >
> >>Hammerer wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>"Don M." <newsreader@nospam4fineartsnospam.com> wrote in message
> >>>news:1125976943.f41c67b9237704ea6f939c7ac17f3df8@teranews...
> >>
> >>>>"anthonyberet" wrote in message news:3o44rmF45pa9U1@individual.net...
> >>
> >>>>>ooo your such a meanie...
> >>>>
> >>>>Hmmm. His such a meanie, yes. :)
> >>>>What are you going to do about it?
> >>>>
> >>
> >>>Yeah, anthonyberet! What about my such a meanie?
> >>>Leave it out of this!
> >>
> >>Oh bugger, and I am so proud of my grammar too,
> >>(not my extinct nans).
> >>
> >
> >
> > You're not proud of your extinct nans? That's a terrible thing to say.
> > What a blow to her memory. You'll be digging her up, next, or worse.
> >
> >
> Now you see, I read that as that I will be digging her (them -
> I had two nans at one stage) up next, or worse than next.
>
You've got it! By Jove, you've got it!
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|