|
Posted by anthonyberet on 09/10/05 09:47
fred-bloggs wrote:
> anthonyberet <nospam@me.invalid> wrote in
> news:3obdgsF54pu3U1@individual.net:
>
>
>>If I understand correctly what is happening with the type 5 fakes, it
>>is that a hacked or bespoke client gets the addresses of lots of
>>primaries from the peer cache server and uploads a fake library.dat
>>file to all of them. Blocking ranges at the cache server would be a
>>good quick fix, but might have workarounds, such as proxying.
>
>
> I see no reason to use hacked or bespoke clients, it is a simple matter
> to use winMX itself as a source of fake files.
>
How? We are talking about type fives, not type fours.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|