|
|
Posted by George Hester on 09/22/05 01:23
"DrWho3000" <mork@mindyworld.com> wrote in message
news:MGhYe.18057$6p.8831@newsfe4-gui.ntli.net...
>
>
> "bob" <bob@jobbin.com> wrote in message
> news:43319c09$0$16317$9a6e19ea@unlimited.newshosting.com...
> > Well old boy it looks like the end of an era.
> >
> > Will miss MX and miss your noobie fun on here.
> >
> > Would one consider helping the WinMX chaps to upgrade to another
network?
> > It could be a whole new challenge for you! LMAO
>
> Quote Text:
> heard /seen on a Chatroom
>
> There is a group Working on a 60 patch for mx that will enable us to uise
> it and run our own cache servers
>
> >BTW, if WinMX was never centralized, and ran on its many primary nodes,
> >how can FrontCode (or any one person or entity) be able to shut it
> >down?
>
> This is my argument if there is no Central server & each person is
connected
> to the next how was it completly shut down... At 1st I thought the ISP's
> were port blocking
>
> Surely it would be easy for some1 to set up another Peer Cache to get
WinMX
> going again.
> --
> Better To Be Thought An Idiot Than To
> Open The Gob And Have It Proved Beyond Doubt
> ----
> AntiVirus Checked With Sophos
> ----
>
>
What the heck are you all taking about? Seems fine here although I am not
getting any file requests today. Weird.
--
George Hester
_________________________________
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|