|
|
Posted by Morton Davis on 10/03/26 11:27
"FatKat" <robynari@juno.com> wrote in message
news:1127503788.990183.123300@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>
> Morton Davis wrote:
> > "FatKat" <robynari@juno.com> wrote in message
> > news:1127496549.388224.261520@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
> > >
> > > Morton Davis wrote:
> > > > "Andy" <Andy@nowhere.com> wrote in message
> > > > news:3WVYe.7944$wm3.4877@newsfe6-win.ntli.net...
> > > > > Farewell Mr & Mrs Winmx Ng......
> > > > > xxxxxx......xxxxxx
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > Why do you say that? WinMx is on it's way back. I give it a month
before
> > the
> > > > network is back up another month before everyone gets the news about
the
> > new
> > > > changes they'll have to make to connect.
> > >
> > > Be interesting to see how they get around the RIAA. Apparently the
> > > industry had to pose some tangible threat if FC took the network down.
> > > >
> > > > Hey, RIAA, MPAA, how do decentralized cache servers that you can't
find
> > > > sound? How does rotating cache servers sound?
> > >
> > > Do they need to actually find servers or even take down the network?
> > > All they need to do is just sue a few sharers every month
> >
> > How're they going to do that? With no central servers to raid for IP
> > numbers?
>
> How did they ever do it?
>
With WinMx, they attacked Front Code. But they couldn't get to users. Other
sources logged IP numbers members had to sign up with home addresses.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|