|
|
Posted by speeder on 09/27/05 01:32
On Mon, 26 Sep 2005 12:34:04 +0100, "db" <@ .> wrote:
>P.S. I should also mention that as far as I'm aware, and probably only until
>possibly very recently, applications like PG & PW never took care of some of
>the worst media company fakers on the WPN; the dynamically addressed fakers.
>For as far as I know PG & PW's blocklists still do not contain these
>dynamics unless a user specifically adds a 'non-standard' list of IPs (such
>as those being listed on http://www.winmxworld.com/, which is, in my quite
>biased opinion, probably the best list I've ever seen outside of my own,
>lmao (not saying I'm perfect at all, but at least they contain the
>dynamics!)).
db, perhaps you could teach the guys at PG or PW what those dynamic
ranges are about so they could include them? PG status is a bit
uncertain after recent events but PW forums are standing firm. And
either way, the blocklists are shared between them even if they make
edits afterwards.
PG downloads count in excess of 2 million so your knowledge would
benefit a lot of people.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|