|
|
Posted by anthonyberet on 09/27/05 23:52
ChenHA wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Sep 2005 23:38:09 +0100, anthonyberet <nospam@me.invalid>
> wrote:
>
>
>>
>>If we continue to use these kind of host files, i don't see that as a
>>problem - one can just combine more than one of the hostfiles, and put
>>it out as the combined version - this has already happened, with KM and
>>Dr Drac's files coming out separately but already having been combined
>>on at least one site.
>
>
> The thing is, anyone can start a peer cache server, including the
> RIAA. You only use the one you trust. Do you trust someone who
> combine peer cache from just anywhere without checking if they are
> trust-worthy?
>
>
>
>>Who knows? - I think they are doing this because they love Winmx though,
>>which isn't a bad motivation.
>
>
> Do we know the motivation of everyone who might do it?
>
>
I am happier using replacement hosts-files, as even if leading to evil
peer caches, those caches wont know what files you have or are sharing -
AFAIK that isn't in the winmx protocol.
Running .exe- type patches is potentially more dangerous, of course.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|