Posted by Hammerer on 09/29/05 14:10

"Perseus" <ComHost-h0001.erase@hccnet.nl> wrote in message
news:66w7Q5Am9UJAXoyDG3aGYYsUzAn2@4ax.com...
>
> On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 21:33:57 +0100, "O.Deere"
> <o@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >"Perseus" <ComHost-h0001.erase@hccnet.nl> wrote in message
> >news:K7I6Q5gJlaF24xVEArz28uxNMdnz@4ax.com...
> >>
> >> On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 14:41:15 GMT, "mikeyhsd"
> >> <mikeyhsd@sport.rr.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >
> >> > host file is SAFE, even if it is not automatically updated.
> >> >
> >>
> >> Hey, of course the "hosts" file is safe! Who said it wasn't?
> >>
>
> >Not "mikeyhsd"; that's for certain. Calm down.
> >>
>
>
> No, indeed he didn't *say* it, but at least he implied it, that's what
> I meant. And because some posters in this ng seem to shy away from
> the "hosts" file, and it appeared to me like mikeyhsd did so as well,
>
It appears to *me* that you simply mis-read what "mikeyhsd said. Shit
happens.
>
> I thought I needed to express myself like I did in that post.
> That is all.
>
I understand. It's just that you fucked-up with your interpretation of what
was said, and expressed yourself badly. That is all.

• Next in forum: Re: New fix for connecting WinMX
• Prev in forum: Re: Just not fun anymore..... or, It's too angry here.
• Thread view: Re: Repost: New WinMX fix out for the WPN peer caches (replaces hosts patches) !

[Reply to this message]