|
|
Posted by Cheryl D. on 10/01/05 08:43
Loco Jones wrote:
> "Cheryl D." <me@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:dhkqpr$c2k$1@domitilla.aioe.org...
>
>>Loco Jones wrote:
>>
>>>>< s n i p >
>>>>
>>>>>I can pretty much guarantee you I have, or can obtain quickly,
>>>>>*any* song you care to mention. So what?
>>>>
>>>>*any* song??? Get "Round Round" by Jonathan King.
>>>>[...] See you in about a million years.
>>>
>>>Sorry, is that supposed to be rare or something?
>>> http://tinyurl.com/avnug
>>>Go ahead, treat yourself.
>>>
>>>- Loco -
>>>(Now Playing: Everyone's Gone To The Moon - Jonathan King)
>>>
>>
>>It's interesting that the title on this messge says
>>"You guys are f_cking liars"
>>I've read messages in this newsgroup back about a week to find
>>answers to my winmx problems. I found working solutions and
>>now my winmx works again. Thanks to all posters that supplied
>>working help! (ws2_32.dll)
>
>
> You read a whole week of posts on this newsgroup?
> Wow. I'm almost impressed.
It doesn't take long to spot a loser like you.
>
>
>>I also read THIS message and couldn't help but wonder about
>>you Loco Jones.
>
>
> Then visit Google Groups and wonder no longer.
>
>
>>You flamed George Hester for saying 1@odds could find anything
>>on winmx and get it, and if he couldn't, then it doesn't exist on winmx.
>>Now enter Loco Jones, ranting that yes, 1@odds does indeed get the
>>files, and even post them to a binary group for people to ACTUALLY
>>GET THEM.
>
>
> That's not exactly what he said, no, but by all means demonstrate exactly
> how much comprehension you have of the topic at hand. WinMX was not
> mentioned.
OK, my mistake, I was just so sure this was the Winmx newsgroup. You
must have failed in your english courses over the years. There is such
a thing as 'understood ' such as to tell someone to go over there, it is
understood you are talking to them and not the wall, or, "searching" is
understood to be on Winmx. This isn't the easter bunny newsgroup.
>
> My history with George Hester goes back quite a bit further than "one week"
> on this NG. Had you looked into that before jumping in with both feet, you
> might look a little less ridiculous. Also, this is the WinMX newsgroup, and
> as such, has nothing to do with the binaries hierarchy.
Oh, so I was right, this IS the Winmx newsgroup, and as such has nothing
to do with music files that are to be found on storeshelves either.
>
>
>>Loco Jones continues in boasting that he either has, or could "obtain
>>quickly" any song. 1@odds (the one Loco Jones so flippantly knocked)
>>rose to the occasion giving Loco Jones a "put up or shut up" challenge
>>to go get, AND POST just one song.
>
>
> Why would I post anything to a binary group just because someone demands
> it? It was 1@odds who wrote <quote>... "Now *who* is still the undesputed
> champion at getting, or having, the very file someone comes here seeking?"
> <end quote>... I merely "desputed" that claim.
A dispute to such a claim requires proof to make it invalid. If the
claim is true, he was right and proper to call upon anyone that could do
better, no?
>
> Apart from myself, I'm sure there are others who are equally adept at
> finding obscure tunes. His statement was grandiose, as was my retort,
so if you're sitting at the bar, and some guy says he can kick
anybody's ass in the room. You'll be there a month later saying that he
wasn't so big- there were plenty of guys who could beat his ass,
including yourself, but when the time is now, you slither off under a chair.
> although I did say as a disclaimer "I can pretty much guarantee..." The are
> no absolutes.
Yea- the devil is in the fine print, as usual.
Yes, you can find it, in a store, but so can anyone else. What stands
out about you is that you can't deliver on anything. You could have
(maybe) found the song and supplied 1@odds the username and numbers of
someone that did have it and he could have checked their files too,
verifying your claim of success. If he truly could find anything shared
on winmx, he would have found the same source you did, and others
reading here could have participated also, verifying your success. You
also could have downloaded it (if you found it) and had him meet you in
a chat room to show it without "sharing" it with him or anybody else,
thus you would still be safe sitting in the dark in front of your
computer, sharing, giving, trading- nothing. Why do you come here when
it's obvious you don't even use Winmx? What, YOU get caught with a
pirated music file??? Never!!!
>
> Now, what guarantee do I have that George or anyone wouldn't report me for
> violation of copyright were I to post on demand to the binaries? I
> certainly don't need to announce my participation in activities of
> questionable legality in a public forum, which is archived.
Yea, play it safe, say that someone with an apparent track record of
accomplishments isn't so great, but hide under the table saying it, you
coward.
>
>
>>(I've been following this closely) Loco Jones tried to slip through the
>>cracks (like a typical rodent) by showing a single LINK to a WEBSTORE
>>that doesn't even have the song!!(CD) Everybody go look !
>>They don't even have it !! (but they’ll order it- ha!)ANYBODY could do
>>that Loco Jones !!!
>
>
> Obviously, not closely enough. If anybody could "do that", then ask
> yourself why 1@odds didn't. The point is, it's *available* - and doubtless
> has been, and will be again, ripped and shared across different networks.
No, the point is YOU said you either had it, or could get it quickly.
Waiting for mail-order is not quickly, and it does nothing to show
someone is not the best at searching winmx to find and get it. This is
after all, the winmx newsgroup so I'm assuming winmx is the search/find
criteria, but do read on, the next reply is helpful in understanding why
you just said - It's *available* -
> It's been out of stock for a month on that particular website, it's
> available on others, all one has to do is look. It's not out of print, it's
> not some "holy grail" of a lost recording, it's *available*. Whether for
> sale or for share, it's not impossible to get. 1@odds made the comment
> about "seeing me in a million years", so finding a copy in less time than
> that is quickly enough by my estimation.
I read his statement too. It sounds like he had little faith in your
achieving success, at least on winmx. You're the kind of guy that
cheats, on anything and everything, then claims a 'win is a win', no
matter how ill-gotten it was.
>
>
>>A webstore?? Are all your music files on a storeshelf somewhere?
>>What about that "obtain quickly" line you bragged about? Time to eat
>>some fresh HUMBLE PIE Loco Jones! You couldn't actually produce
>>so much as a note of that song. I'd say you owe two people an apology,
>>but you probably don't pay any of your other debts either.... maybe just
>>supply a link to get a visa card when bill collectors ask for payment?
>
>
> Oh dear, now you are just blithering. All my music files came from a
> storeshelf somewhere, or do you believe in the mp3 fairy? As for the rest
> of your spittle-drenched accusations, well, I'm sure you're convinced you
> were both clever and scathing.
I do understand that nearly 100% of all music files originated from a
store somewhere. I question how many of your's are still there and how
many you only imagine are part of your own collection. Nobody will ever
know, because you don't have anything in your share folder, lest you
have someone out there report you for violation of copyright over Winmx.
>
>
>>Yes, it is all too interesting that this post started off with someone
>>saying "You guys are f_cking liars" It’s all so fitting to Loco Jones,
>>but then I don't think they could have possibly known just what that
>>title would uncover! You feel so great in front of your monitor, big
>>words, small man and no action! I put garbage down my disposal
>>that's better than you.
>
>
> More of that witty repartee and sparkling wordplay with which you are
> quickly establishing your credentials on this newgroup. If you think you
> know anybody posting on usenet (even after considerably longer than a
> week's worth of lurking), then you are not only sadly mistaken, you are
> delusional.
I only came here because winmx quit and I read through this post. When
I saw what you were saying I got angry because your behavior is so like
the litle boy that denied breaking a window, because the rock he threw
actually did the breaking. This newsgroup is such a soap opera, and I
don't care for that as entertaiment so I'm not too concerned about
getting my credentials set around these parts. I don't think I mistaken
about you, sadly or otherwise. I also don't care if you and everybody
here hates me. You're a creep and nothing better.
>>Steamed-in-the-kitchen
>
>
> Then for god's sake, get your head out of the oven.
> I think the fumes are getting to you.
No danger, steam is just boiling water, I'll be making coffee in a minute.
>
>
>>You like to end with an appropriate song, and here's one
>>for you, "You're no good - Linda Ronstat"
>
>
> "When I'm good, I'm very good... when I'm bad, I'm better."
> And it's spelled Linda Ronstadt.
I'll have to apologize to her, and you apparantly are familiar with the
song, someone else played it for you too?
>
> - Loco -
> (Now Playing: Rat In Mi Kitchen - UB40)
Well- my computer is in my kitchen, and true-to-form, when your name is
on the screen a rat truly is in my kitchen, and IB22.
>
Hey, it's your favorite song:
"Dirty Deeds Done Dirt Cheap - ACDC"
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|