|
|
Posted by Loco Jones on 10/01/05 18:19
"Cheryl D." <me@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:dhli87$70c$1@domitilla.aioe.org...
> Loco Jones wrote:
> >>>>< s n i p >
> > You read a whole week of posts on this newsgroup?
> > Wow. I'm almost impressed.
>
> It doesn't take long to spot a loser like you.
If jumping to conclusions was an Olymic sport, no doubt you'd be a gold
medal winner.
> OK, my mistake, I was just so sure this was the Winmx newsgroup.
> You must have failed in your english courses over the years. There is
> such a thing as 'understood ' such as to tell someone to go over there,
> it is understood you are talking to them and not the wall, or,
"searching"
> is understood to be on Winmx. This isn't the easter bunny newsgroup.
You're a fine one to attempt to explain the concept of "understood".
You've demonstrated your inability to grasp the obvious from your very
first post.
> > Why would I post anything to a binary group just because someone
> > demands it? It was 1@odds who wrote <quote>... "Now *who* is
> > still the undesputed champion at getting, or having, the very file
someone
> > comes here seeking?" <end quote>... I merely "desputed" that claim.
>
> A dispute to such a claim requires proof to make it invalid. If
> the claim is true, he was right and proper to call upon anyone
> that could do better, no?
You seem to be labouring under the misconception that I have something to
prove. By all means, re-read my <quote> of 1@odds statement, above.
> so if you're sitting at the bar, and some guy says he can kick
> anybody's ass in the room. You'll be there a month later saying
> that he wasn't so big- there were plenty of guys who could beat
> his ass, including yourself, but when the time is now, you slither
> off under a chair.
Wow, you really put the "anal" into analogy, don't you?
Perhaps equating a difference of opinion with a bar-room brawl provides a
"cultural" reference in your world, but it doesn't in mine.
> > although I did say as a disclaimer "I can pretty much guarantee..."
> The are no absolutes.
>
> Yea- the devil is in the fine print, as usual.
You should try reading it sometime, you might learn something.
> Yes, you can find it, in a store, but so can anyone else.
> What stands out about you is that you can't deliver on anything.
What, pray tell, do you base this completely ludicrous statement on?
> You could have (maybe) found the song and supplied 1@odds
> the username and numbers of someone that did have it and he could
> have checked their files too, verifying your claim of success. If he
truly
> could find anything shared on winmx, he would have found the same
> source you did, and others reading here could have participated also,
> verifying your success.
> You also could have downloaded it (if you found it) and had him meet
> you in a chat room to show it without "sharing" it with him or anybody
> else, thus you would still be safe sitting in the dark in front of your
> computer, sharing, giving, trading- nothing.
Again with the presumption I would have any desire to do so, for someone I
don't know, in response to a challenge issued in a public forum. There are
more weapons than WinMX in the file-sharing arsenal, some of which are far
less high-profile at the moment. Sorry, I decline to dance to your silly
tune.
> Why do you come here when it's obvious you don't even use Winmx?
It's "obvious"?! PPOSTFU, thank you.
> What, YOU get caught with a pirated music file??? Never!!!
Well, I would hope "never", unless getting caught with a "pirated music
file" is something you aspire to? Also, I don't subscribe to the theory
that a song shared, in a not-for-profit manner, qualifies as piracy.
However, since the copyright cartel is convinced otherwise, I like to try
and keep my activities on the 'net outside their purview.
> > Now, what guarantee do I have that George or anyone wouldn't
> > report me for violation of copyright were I to post on demand
> > to the binaries? I certainly don't need to announce my participation
> > in activities of questionable legality in a public forum, which is
archived.
>
> Yea, play it safe, say that someone with an apparent track record
> of accomplishments isn't so great, but hide under the table saying it,
> you coward.
There you go, veering off into nonsense territory again. Honestly, up the
meds or reduce the dose, but try and find the highway back to reality (mind
the gone-off ramp).
> I do understand that nearly 100% of all music files originated from
> a store somewhere. I question how many of your's are still there
> and how many you only imagine are part of your own collection.
> Nobody will ever know, because you don't have anything in your
> share folder, lest you have someone out there report you for violation
> of copyright over Winmx.
How would you know what I have in my share folder? Or even my user name on
that app? Crystal ball, casting chicken bones, or are you just stirring the
cauldron there?
> I only came here because winmx quit and I read through this post.
> When I saw what you were saying I got angry because your behavior
> is so like the litle boy that denied breaking a window, because the rock
> he threw actually did the breaking. This newsgroup is such a soap
> opera, and I don't care for that as entertaiment so I'm not too concerned
> about getting my credentials set around these parts. I don't think I
> mistaken about you, sadly or otherwise. I also don't care if you and
> everybody here hates me. You're a creep and nothing better.
The above paragraph can be condensed to "I don't think". Period.
Although, not thinking certainly hasn't prevented you from posting thus
far.
> >>Steamed-in-the-kitchen
> >
> > Then for god's sake, get your head out of the oven.
> > I think the fumes are getting to you.
>
> No danger, steam is just boiling water, I'll be making coffee in a
minute.
Ahh, so it *is* the cauldron after all.
- Loco -
(Now Playing: Season Of The Witch - Vanilla Fudge)
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|