|
|
Posted by Hammerer on 10/02/05 16:02
"Cheryl D." <me@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:dho7l7$b8t$1@domitilla.aioe.org...
>
> Hammerer wrote:
>
> > "Don M." <newsreader@nospam4fineartsnospam.com> wrote in message
> > news:DeWdnWPL8qtWMKPeRVnytA@giganews.com...
>
> <snip, he's an idiot and knows it, needs a girlfriend but can't find one>
>
Oh, come on, Cheryl . . . . don't take it all so seriously!
>
> and then Hammerer responded:
>
> >
> > . . . but I really hope 'Cheryl' is genuine.
> > Otherwise, I'd be so . . . . . . disappointed.
> >
>
> Tell you what, somehow we'll just have to meet. I won't
> disappoint you, but don't disappoint me either. Deal?
> Now how am I going to communicate with just *you*?
>
Let's not get too ahead of ourselves, here, Cheryl. The chatter quoted,
above, was referring to the possibility that you are, in fact, 'someone
else'. Someone else who recently left in a bit of a huff, which I was sorry
to see. I'm now almost convinced that you're not "him". I can't imagine why
you want to "meet" (the mind boggles) - but a simple "Ping Hammerer" is
sufficient for this newsgroup. Please note that I'm psychologically
incapable of taking anything seriously, and that I like to mess with
people's heads. And my own. But that's not importanr right now. Yes.
>
> You lost because of your lack of anger, sorry.
>
I'm a peaceful guy. Helpful, too.
>
> Contact me if you'd like. You seem to be a smart man- There is a
> clue someplace that you can use. Validate that it is you somehow
> and leave a short alpha-numeric code as others will try as imposters.
>
They've tried, Cheryl. How they've tried! Tried and failed? No! Tried and
died!!!
>
> When I am at least somewhat sure it is you, I'll put your code in a
> ping post here. If it is really you, just respond yea or nay as only
> your source route comes from you despite the lack of an IP
> number. If not you then I'll try again.
>
Such complication, Cheryl! Occam's razor!
>
> Your song is-
> - Someday Soon - Judy Collins
>
Great! I like the punk rock!
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|