|
|
Posted by fred-bloggs on 10/03/05 01:41
"db" <@.> wrote in
news:43406978$0$15058$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net:
>
> "fred-bloggs" <fred-bloggs@hahahotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:43404eb2$0$78704$892e7fe2@authen.white.readfreenews.net...
>> "Billy Joe" <see.id.line@invalid.org> wrote in
>> news:dPadnZgogOsyrKLeRVn- hw@adelphia.com:
>>
>>> Somehow I see their people and our people sitting at consoles and
>>> typing madly like the schlockiest of TV melodramas with the fastest
>>> typist(s) hoisting one for the queens ;-0)
>>>
>>
>> Just read this (mind the wrap)
>> http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-piracytwo2oct02,1,6430710.story?
>> coll=la-headlines-business
>> <quote>
>> Overpeer takes advantage of the Internet's inability to tell who's at
>> the controls of any computer online. The software lets a single
>> computer pretend to be more than 10,000 people, none of which look
>> any different to the untrained eye from real users on a peer-to-peer
>> network. <unquote>
>>
>> So, we have several thousand faking secondaries sitting on the same
>> IP?
>>
>> --
>> fred
>
> Across a handful of IP addresses, yeah, that's what they do. A very
> small number of addresses really (see blocklists).
>
I've just done a quick (not entirely accurate) analysis of your list and
in summary of the 6745 entries
IP address :port range :x number of distinct ports used
64.248.57.132:33349-60907:x112
66.166.198.203:32790-60907:x227
67.101.77.191:32812-60817:x112
68.165.91.118:32886-60698:x127
70.51.124.42:32798-60874:x119
81.156.180.20:32786-60249:x139
81.158.250.176:32953-60754:x84
86.134.204.87:33109-60960:x169
88.111.21.211:32948-60907:x64
--
fred
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|