|
|
Posted by Loco Jones on 09/28/80 11:28
"George Hester" <hesterloli@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:eHV0f.27826$Xl2.22965@twister.nyroc.rr.com...
> You know Loco I am truly sorry I attcaked you in the way I did.
Not to worry, George, I've pretty much come to expect that - as you've been
on the offensive ever since your first appearance in this NG. May I refer
you to your posts slamming advice offered on how to effectively communicate
in usenet, going back to day one?
> I would like to explain something to you and of course you
> can take it or leave it.
Of course. Just as you can "take" or "leave" whatever I post here.
I would certainly never accuse you of being a liar just because I might
doubt your veracity.
> I used to teach Mathematics in University to undergraduates.
> Most were not majoring in Mathematics but in Buisness.
> When I taught Calculus they were mostly Sophomore Engineering
> students. But in both cases when a student asked me question no
> matter how trivial I made it a point to answer the question.
> Even if I knew the question showed a lack of understanding of the
> subject I would do my best to answer the question.
> Often I would suggest alternative ways of looking at the issue but
> an answer to the question was always paramount.
Well, I will have to "leave" this part certainly, since it appears you've
given up browsing yourself in favour of patting yourself on the back.
> There are contributors to this forum who do similarly.
> odds AnthonyB even FatKat.
> They almost always answer the question.
> Before Hammerer underwent his transformoation he answered
> the question as he read it. Some of them were funny some were
> perplexing but he did.
> Loco you do not do that. Very rarely do I see you ever answer
> a question if ever. That implies something about your nature.
> What exactly that is I'll leave it to you to decide if I have a point
> or not.
On "point", I'll have to go with "not", thanks.
If you think I have rarely/never answered a question during my years of
posting here, then you haven't been paying attention. Understandable, I
suppose, if you view everything I write as some kind of attack upon you
personally. The only thing implied about my "nature" is that you don't
quite know what that is.
You see, it's statements like this <quote> "I haven't even read this but
I'm sure it is more of the same." <end quote>, your earlier response on
this thread, which leads me to speculate you are no stranger to jumping to
conclusions. I've yet to see that actually work for anyone.
HTH and GL. HAND.
- Loco -
(Now Playing: Ball Of Confusion - Love & Rockets)
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|