|
|
Posted by Hammerer on 10/01/56 11:28
"Triffid" <spamme@microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:4344f43d@212.67.96.135...
>
> Hammerer wrote:
>
> > "Perseus" <ComHost-h0001.erase@hccnet.nl> wrote in message
> > news:jJdEQ+hRKdmQTn1b8zcA9Dvv=Cox@4ax.com...
> >
> >>On Thu, 06 Oct 2005 00:16:32 +0100, Triffid
> >><spamme@microsoft.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>To quote the actual last paragraph:
> >>>'Some extremists still wait for the second coming of WinMX
> >>>and hope it will fulfill the great promise this network once had.'
> >>>Slyck was Winmx's primary advocate in the Good Old Days, and
> >>>is now sounding its death knell with barely a backward glance at the
> >>>efforts from many quarters to keep it alive. The article has the tone
> >>>of a guy dumped by his girlfriend and hopelessly asking 'WHY?'.
> >>>
> >>
> >>Triffid,
> >>Sometimes I go over a post a little too quickly, thus missing
> >>the point made. I think this is what's happened in my reading
> >>your post and subsequently replying to it as I have done.
> >>As I now understand it, you were actually mocking the
> >>author of the article in question, were you not?
> >>
> >
> >
> > Don't keep Pers in suspense, Triffs. Were you actually mocking
> > the author of the article in question, were you not?
> >
> >
>
> I may have mocked, I may merely have been a little sardonic.
> It's hard to tell after a good nights sleep. Google time:
> the reports of whose death were exaggerated?
>
Mine?
http://tinyurl.com/crdm4
>
> Pay attention, there will be a test later.
>
I'm intrigued. Who is "attention", and how much do I pay him?
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|