|
|
Posted by CJ on 09/07/05 02:47
"Tarkus" <karnevil9@beer.com> wrote in message
news:sitysv98hjmt.dlg@tarkus.karnevil9.com...
> On 9/4/2005 8:12:38 PM, CJ wrote:
>
>> "Tarkus" <karnevil9@beer.com> wrote in message
>> news:19yh6apki67o0$.dlg@tarkus.karnevil9.com...
>>> On 8/31/2005 2:38:05 PM, CJ wrote:
>>>
>>>> "Tarkus" <karnevil9@beer.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:xa9usfn3f7my$.dlg@tarkus.karnevil9.com...
>>>>> On 8/30/2005 2:51:33 PM, CJ wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Especially since you probably, like me, have a good collection of
>>>>>> DVD's that you don't want to become obsolete.
>>>>>
>>>>> Why would your collection become obsolete?
>>>>
>>>> Well it wouldn't...but if you had an HD DVD player, you wouldn't
>>>> want to watch your old DVD's as much I'd think.
>>>
>>> So you don't want something better to come along, because you might
>>> like it? How odd.
>>
>> I didn't say that. I just didn't want to buy the best new thing if I
>> couldn't play my old DVD's on it.
>
> You didn't say you were worried about the inability to play your
> collection. You said, "you wouldn't want to watch your old DVD's as much
> I'd think." Make up your mind.
Oh for the love of Pete....are you really wanting to argue this??
I make a post just for an inquiry and I get nitpicking.
>
> And players from both camps will be backwards compatible, so "if I
> couldn't play my old DVD's on it" is not an issue.
>
> --
> "I'll never wiggle my bare butt in public again."
>
> Now playing: "Pink Floyd - Pigs (3 Different Ones)"
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|