|
|
Posted by Hammerer on 10/08/05 02:32
"George Orwell" <nobody@mixmaster.it> wrote in message
news:3295161a4544e38c63bda27cd309f521@mixmaster.it...
>
> In article <Dbw1f.159$u44.61@newssvr23.news.prodigy.net>
> "Angrie.Woman" <Angrie.Woman@ggmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > anonymous@remailer.hastio.org wrote:
> > > Winmx Users:
> > >
> > > Since things have gotten complex, could one of the knowledgeable users
> > > perhaps post a series of steps for someone who wants to get started
(or
> > > in my case get started after a long absence) with winmx again? The
> > > Vladd44 site says the dedicated users will keep winmx alive. There are
> > > lots of links on Vladd44, but I fear some of them may be outdated and
> > > cause a lot of discouraging failures.
> > >
> >
> > I'm not nearly savvy enough to answer your questions, but it
> > appears that the Vlad44 site is very much up to date. If I can
> > getmine running from there I'm sure you won't have any trouble.
> >
>
> Angrie:
> Thanks for your thoughts. In looking over the Vladd site again,
> it's not really so intimidating, and it's nice to know you find the
> links up to date.
>
Yes. The best idea is to read posts on the Vladd site that have dates as
close to the date that is *now*. That way, you're assured they're up to
date. Avoid reading those that are considerably older than yesterday, say.
Those are NOT up to date. You can find the said dates next to the posts
themselves. With a bit of practice, and a keen eye, you'll soon get the hang
of it.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|