|
|
Posted by George Hester on 10/10/05 06:28
"speeder" <no.spam@invalid.com> wrote in message
news:7lajk1deruvgim3fip791ugdev7opb8uns@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 09 Oct 2005 15:34:05 GMT, "George Hester"
> <hesterloli@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >Amazing. Normally I have 50+ in queue after 15 hours now I have 2. Fake
> >Peer Cache servers out there.
>
> Come on, George, stop it now. You're beggining to sound like a troll
> spreading FUD. If you got the patch, dll or hosts file from winmxgroup
> or winmxworld, you can't get a fake. The peer cache servers have been
> publicly anounced at http://www.winmxgroup.com/check.php. If you're
> using any of those than you're alright.
>
> Last I checked they were:
> 205.238.40.2
> 212.227.64.159
> 82.195.155.5
> 67.18.233.36
> 82.43.224.20
>
> Sometimes they can go weary which could explain network instability
> and lack of peers.
>
Speeder I really do not care what you think I sound like. Fact is the WinMX
has performed poorly all day. And getting connected problems is NOT what I
have been saying. There are other issues which you may have addressed as
Network instability and lack of peers. Of course you could have said that
at anytime. I have never experienced this level of bullshit in WinMX prior
to the Big Squeeze. Never. Lack of peers is likely true but then why?
Getting connected is only half the problem.
--
George Hester
_________________________________
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|