|
|
Posted by Angrie.Woman on 10/11/05 16:43
Perseus wrote:
> On Fri, 07 Oct 2005 15:06:19 GMT, "Angrie.Woman"
> <Angrie.Woman@ggmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>>Is there an advantage to that over the hosts solution? It seems the
>>HOSTS people didn't have the nasty second bit of trouble we 'dll-ers did.
>>
>>A
>
>
> Angrie.Woman,
>
> WinMXWorld.com says this with regard to the difference in using the
> ".dll" fix compared to using the "hosts" file patch:
>
> "If you are currently using one of the modified Hosts files to connect
> then it is strongly advised that you switch to using this patch as the
> host files restrict you to specific peer caches, this patch also
> contains additional features such as blocking the RIAA that should help
> the network out a lot."
>
> Furthermore, it can of course become a little tiresome to some people,
> if they find they need to update their "hosts" file again and again,
> because a revised version of the patch is being released every couple
> of days.
>
> As far as any problems concerning the use of the ".dll" fix, a bug in
> that ".dll" fix has been identified and resolved with the release
> (10/10/05) of the latest version of "WS2_32.dll". Looky here:
> http://www.winmxgroup.com
>
Thanks for that. But ya know...mine ain't broke right now. I *really* am
reluctant to mess with it.
A
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|