|
|
Posted by Loco Jones on 10/13/05 02:25
"frank-in-toronto" <thehickOBVIOUS@OBVIOUScanada.com> wrote
in message news:43erk1dcceql8lhnekdup1p8ppakmit2gp@4ax.com...
> why is there so much effort being put into getting the peer cache
> servers up again?
Why not? Some people are loathe to let the RIAA "win", even if their
press-release trumpeted victory is hollow.
> Just let them go. Back to opennet.
Opennap? Yes, that's one alternative (worthwhile and appreciated as it is),
but it's not the only one.
> I can't imagine sufficient people going to the trouble of hosts
> and dll and this and that.
It's really not rocket science. The temporary WinMX "fixes" posted
shouldn't confound anyone but the most completely compter-illiterate.
> most have left already. anyone capable enough to read/post
> on usenet should be able to get their opennap servers going.
I'm unsure how you know for a fact that "most have left already", but I
will agree with you that "anyone capable enough to read/post on usenet
should be able to get [...]" - WinMX working again.
- Loco -
(Now Playing: A Point Of View - Jose Feliciano)
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|