Reply to Re: What am i missing?

Your name:

Reply:


Posted by Loco Jones on 10/13/05 02:25

"frank-in-toronto" <thehickOBVIOUS@OBVIOUScanada.com> wrote
in message news:43erk1dcceql8lhnekdup1p8ppakmit2gp@4ax.com...
> why is there so much effort being put into getting the peer cache
> servers up again?

Why not? Some people are loathe to let the RIAA "win", even if their
press-release trumpeted victory is hollow.

> Just let them go. Back to opennet.

Opennap? Yes, that's one alternative (worthwhile and appreciated as it is),
but it's not the only one.

> I can't imagine sufficient people going to the trouble of hosts
> and dll and this and that.

It's really not rocket science. The temporary WinMX "fixes" posted
shouldn't confound anyone but the most completely compter-illiterate.

> most have left already. anyone capable enough to read/post
> on usenet should be able to get their opennap servers going.

I'm unsure how you know for a fact that "most have left already", but I
will agree with you that "anyone capable enough to read/post on usenet
should be able to get [...]" - WinMX working again.

- Loco -
(Now Playing: A Point Of View - Jose Feliciano)

[Back to original message]


Удаленная работа для программистов  •  Как заработать на Google AdSense  •  статьи на английском  •  England, UK  •  PHP MySQL CMS Apache Oscommerce  •  Online Business Knowledge Base  •  IT news, forums, messages
Home  •  Search  •  Site Map  •  Set as Homepage  •  Add to Favourites
Разработано в студии "Webous"