|
|
Posted by Sammy on 09/09/05 19:50
In article <mMSdnZ2dnZ3-fXvAnZ2dnW6dvN6dnZ2dRVn-y52dnZ0@giganews.com>,
"Nonymous" <noham@nospam.com> wrote:
> "Sammy" <sammy@xxx.invalid> wrote in message
> news:11i1lgbg347hla9@news.supernews.com...
> > In article <140eeiu0m186n$.dlg@tarkus.karnevil9.com>,
> > Tarkus <karnevil9@beer.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On 9/7/2005 12:29:40 PM, Sammy wrote:
> >>
> >> > In article <7l7axi8xdpe1.dlg@tarkus.karnevil9.com>,
> >> > Tarkus <karnevil9@beer.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Regarding cost, Samsung's stuff is generally competitively priced, so
> >> >> I
> >> >> doubt if it will be THAT much more than a single format player from
> >> >> their
> >> >> competitors.
> >> >
> >> > Haven't you read Samsung's latest press release? They intend to become
> >> > a
> >> > top tier company. And that means top tier pricing.
> >>
> >> Perhaps, but others will come out with their own dual format players.
> >
> > Probably so. But I now believe that by the time these companies come out
> > with dual format players, it will be too late. The format war will make
> > high definition DVDs stillborn. If the dual format players appeared the
> > same day high def DVDs premiered, it might have a chance. But mid or
> > late 2006 will be too late. Hollywood really blew it by not backing a
> > single format.
>
> "too late" for what?
Too late for you to understand what's being discussed.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|