|
|
Posted by anthonyberet on 10/23/05 10:51
George Hester wrote:
> "George Hester" <hesterloli@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:QTH6f.99602$7b6.31448@twister.nyroc.rr.com...
>
>>"anthonyberet" <nospam@me.invalid> wrote in message
>>news:3s08crFlttrkU1@individual.net...
>>
>>>George Hester wrote:
>>>
>>>>"anthonyberet" <nospam@me.invalid> wrote in message
>>>>news:3ruqehFln7ngU1@individual.net...
>>>>
>
> <snip>
>
> Furthermore those who share partials are ripping off the d/lder.
Not convinced. - My experience is that it is an essential service.
> Say you
> have a partial and and someone has a file you want. First you are not going
> to ask someone for his partial. You are only going to ask someone who has
> the entire file because you hope it completes.
That is true, assuming that there is a complete file within your search
horizon at the time.
> To avoid the File Mismatch
> error secondarily to your desire to have the complete file. Now if we keep
> our partials in our shares and someone starts not by trade and then as they
> get all excited they are finally going to finish the file it goes BLEEP!
> RED! DISCONNECTED! Now you as the d/lder are not a happy camper anymore are
> you? In fact you are wondering why the sharer cut you off. Well they
> didn't. They were sharing partials.
Data is data. - Complete data is best, but incomplete data is better
than no data.
> And now you will be a lucky dog if
> that file will ever d/l again.
On the contrary, I find it works out fine time and time again.
> When I see a user with a partial
> contributing to one of my partials I cancel them out. I don't want that
> from them. It's too risky.
>
Fair enough - I hope you don't cut them off if they are uploading from
you though. - They are trying to help you, after all.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|