|
|
Posted by Don M. on 10/30/05 03:30
"db" <@ .> wrote in message news:4363832c$0$49801$ed2e19e4@ptn-nntp-reader04.plus.net...
> "Don M." wrote in message news:Sb2dnVtPcdvplP7eRVnyvA@giganews.com...
> > "db" <@ .> wrote in message
news:43624234$0$15051$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net...
> >> "Don M." wrote in message news:yoGdnYyLCoUqM_zeRVnysg@giganews.com...
> >> > "db" <@ .> wrote in message
news:4361419a$0$73616$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader03.plus.net...
> >> >>
> >> >> Oh my, anyone remember this?;
> >> >> http://www.nodata.plus.com/stuff/incompletes.htm
> >> >>
> >> >> :o
> >> >
> >> > Absolutely! <as I reach for the bottle of aspirin>
> >> > Loco is the only participant still active in the group. IIRC Gronaad
> >> > made mincemeat of
> >> > uk-bandit, got his head handed to him in a brown bag and sent the dude
> >> > packing for the
> >> > highlands never to be seen or heard from again, but neither one is here
> >> > to confirm or
> >> > contest. :)
> >> >
> >>
> >> (they do say Aspirin may indeed help to alleviate the onset of 'memory
> >> issues' amongst those in their 'autumn years', though, as a loving
> >> friend,
> >> may I be so bold as to suggest you consider increasing the dosage
> >> somewhat.)
> >>
> >> ;)
> >
> > Loving friend, your suggestion seems to have worked. I doubled the dosage
> > and now have
> > better memory. Change that IIRC to AFAIK. :)
>
> Hehehe.
>
> Well, Don, "AFAIK", rather, appears to me to be indicative of uncertainty in
> your thinking on the issue, though I realise that this is for, in my own
> opinion, good reason. The reason I can say this is that I find myself in
> quite a privilaged position here whereby I do, in fact, have in my
> possession accurate knowledge of the current whereabouts of, at least, one
> of the two participants involved (just leave it at that, o.k.). Based on
> this information I am aware that, in reality, only one of the two parties
> mysteriously dissapeared shortly after said conflict. I should mention,
> though, my friend, that this information appears to be in conflict with your
> own thinking as to who exactly got, let's say, buried.
>
=========
But I *do* know the two participants... Let's say there is no point in pulling the leg of
one who's not around. :)
Don
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|