|
|
Posted by db on 10/31/05 20:16
"Don M." <newsreader@nospam4fineartsnospam.com> wrote in message
news:RvGdnQIxiJP7o_nenZ2dnUVZ8tydnZ2d@giganews.com...
>
> "db" <@ .> wrote in message
> news:4363832c$0$49801$ed2e19e4@ptn-nntp-reader04.plus.net...
>> "Don M." wrote in message news:Sb2dnVtPcdvplP7eRVnyvA@giganews.com...
>> > "db" <@ .> wrote in message
> news:43624234$0$15051$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net...
>> >> "Don M." wrote in message news:yoGdnYyLCoUqM_zeRVnysg@giganews.com...
>> >> > "db" <@ .> wrote in message
> news:4361419a$0$73616$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader03.plus.net...
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Oh my, anyone remember this?;
>> >> >> http://www.nodata.plus.com/stuff/incompletes.htm
>> >> >>
>> >> >> :o
>> >> >
>> >> > Absolutely! <as I reach for the bottle of aspirin>
>> >> > Loco is the only participant still active in the group. IIRC
>> >> > Gronaad
>> >> > made mincemeat of
>> >> > uk-bandit, got his head handed to him in a brown bag and sent the
>> >> > dude
>> >> > packing for the
>> >> > highlands never to be seen or heard from again, but neither one is
>> >> > here
>> >> > to confirm or
>> >> > contest. :)
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> (they do say Aspirin may indeed help to alleviate the onset of 'memory
>> >> issues' amongst those in their 'autumn years', though, as a loving
>> >> friend,
>> >> may I be so bold as to suggest you consider increasing the dosage
>> >> somewhat.)
>> >>
>> >> ;)
>> >
>> > Loving friend, your suggestion seems to have worked. I doubled the
>> > dosage
>> > and now have
>> > better memory. Change that IIRC to AFAIK. :)
>>
>> Hehehe.
>>
>> Well, Don, "AFAIK", rather, appears to me to be indicative of uncertainty
>> in
>> your thinking on the issue, though I realise that this is for, in my own
>> opinion, good reason. The reason I can say this is that I find myself in
>> quite a privilaged position here whereby I do, in fact, have in my
>> possession accurate knowledge of the current whereabouts of, at least,
>> one
>> of the two participants involved (just leave it at that, o.k.). Based on
>> this information I am aware that, in reality, only one of the two parties
>> mysteriously dissapeared shortly after said conflict. I should mention,
>> though, my friend, that this information appears to be in conflict with
>> your
>> own thinking as to who exactly got, let's say, buried.
>>
> =========
>
> But I *do* know the two participants... Let's say there is no point in
> pulling the leg of
> one who's not around. :)
>
>
> Don
Hope ya realise I was only jesting, here, Don. ;)
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|