|
Posted by Paul Blay on 10/18/03 11:31
"kim" <ntscuser@aol.com> wrote ...
> "Paul Blay" <ask_me_or_get_spam_trapped@saotome.demon.co.uk> wrote in
> message news:dkqm9o$ee7$1$8302bc10@news.demon.co.uk...
>> "kim" <ntscuser@aol.com> wrote in message
>> news:dkqli1$33p$1@domitilla.aioe.org...
>>> A new user is unlikely to associate that particular link with a working
>>> version of the program. He would assume the version on offer was
>>> out-of-date.
>>
>> Then I guess they would have had to take the extra two seconds to look
>> at the third link. "PCWorld.com - WinMX v3.53"
>
> It's a dead link
Then how come I just downloaded WinMX from it?
> as are many of the others which follow. By that time most
> newbies will have concluded that WinMX no longer exists.
If Columbus gave up as fast as you do he'd never have made it out
of the harbour - let alone to America.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|