|
Posted by kim on 10/18/97 11:31
"Paul Blay" <ask_me_or_get_spam_trapped@saotome.demon.co.uk> wrote in
message news:dks185$ls$1$8300dec7@news.demon.co.uk...
> "kim" <ntscuser@aol.com> wrote ...
>> "Paul Blay" <ask_me_or_get_spam_trapped@saotome.demon.co.uk> wrote in
>> message news:dkqm9o$ee7$1$8302bc10@news.demon.co.uk...
>>> "kim" <ntscuser@aol.com> wrote in message
>>> news:dkqli1$33p$1@domitilla.aioe.org...
>>>> A new user is unlikely to associate that particular link with a working
>>>> version of the program. He would assume the version on offer was
>>>> out-of-date.
>>>
>>> Then I guess they would have had to take the extra two seconds to look
>>> at the third link. "PCWorld.com - WinMX v3.53"
>>
>> It's a dead link
>
> Then how come I just downloaded WinMX from it?
It may be working now, it wasn;t when I tried it a few days ago.
>> as are many of the others which follow. By that time most newbies will
>> have concluded that WinMX no longer exists.
>
> If Columbus gave up as fast as you do he'd never have made it out
> of the harbour - let alone to America.
a) I'm not a newbie, I only needed the file because my hard drive crashed
last week.
b) I didn't give up.
(kim)
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|