|
Posted by Morton Davis on 10/18/34 11:31
"Paul Blay" <ask_me_or_get_spam_trapped@saotome.demon.co.uk> wrote in
message news:dks185$ls$1$8300dec7@news.demon.co.uk...
> "kim" <ntscuser@aol.com> wrote ...
> > "Paul Blay" <ask_me_or_get_spam_trapped@saotome.demon.co.uk> wrote in
> > message news:dkqm9o$ee7$1$8302bc10@news.demon.co.uk...
> >> "kim" <ntscuser@aol.com> wrote in message
> >> news:dkqli1$33p$1@domitilla.aioe.org...
> >>> A new user is unlikely to associate that particular link with a
working
> >>> version of the program. He would assume the version on offer was
> >>> out-of-date.
> >>
> >> Then I guess they would have had to take the extra two seconds to look
> >> at the third link. "PCWorld.com - WinMX v3.53"
> >
> > It's a dead link
>
> Then how come I just downloaded WinMX from it?
>
> > as are many of the others which follow. By that time most
> > newbies will have concluded that WinMX no longer exists.
>
> If Columbus gave up as fast as you do he'd never have made it out
> of the harbour - let alone to America.
15 downloads from 17 users - YUP - it's DEAD....... :-)
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|